Impersonation at scale
Synthetic voices, faces, and documents make impersonation of officials, agencies, and citizens trivial. "It looks legitimate" is no longer evidence of anything.
- Officials
- Agencies
- Citizens
An independent research institute · advising states and public institutions
As AI shifts from assistant to actor, the foundations of public trust — who you are dealing with, where information came from, and who is accountable — can no longer be assumed. The selfdriven Institute helps states build verifiable digital trust into the fabric of how they identify citizens, govern institutions, and hold autonomous systems to account.
Explore the research Or start with the 8 Areas of FocusYear autonomous agents are projected to act across critical public services at scale
Of digital communications a state can cryptographically verify with the right trust layer
Witness threshold securing every identity event — no single point of control
Built on open standards (KERI, ACDC, vLEI) — no vendor lock-in, no foreign dependency
The sovereign challenge
That world is ending. Generative and agentic AI dissolve the cues citizens, officials, and institutions have always relied on to judge what is real and who is responsible. States that do not rebuild trust on verifiable foundations will govern in an environment they cannot authenticate.
Trust has to be verifiable, not assumed.
Read the papersSynthetic voices, faces, and documents make impersonation of officials, agencies, and citizens trivial. "It looks legitimate" is no longer evidence of anything.
When any record, image, or statement can be fabricated, the chain of evidence behind public decisions, elections, and entitlements becomes contestable.
Autonomous agents already initiate actions on behalf of organisations. Without delegated, revocable authority, no one can say which human is answerable for what an AI did.
Our focus
We are not a vendor. We are a research institute that helps governments understand the threat, set the standards, and build sovereign trust infrastructure on open foundations they control.
Peer-informed papers, briefings, and scenario work on AI risk, digital trust, and verifiable identity — written for ministers, regulators, and senior officials who need clarity, not hype.
Reference frameworks for sovereign digital identity, communications verification, and agent accountability — grounded in open standards a state can adopt without surrendering control.
Direct advisory to departments and agencies: threat assessment, architecture review, and a roadmap from pilot to national deployment, with your people building the capability.
Education programs that prepare citizens, students, and public servants to live and work in a world reshaped by autonomous AI — because trust infrastructure is only as strong as the people using it.
Sovereignty means the state controls its own root of trust. The architecture we research and recommend is built on open identity standards — autonomous identifiers, witnessed key events, and verifiable credentials — so authority is cryptographic, portable, and never dependent on a single provider or foreign jurisdiction.
Each layer is independently verifiable. A citizen, an official, an agency, or an AI agent can prove who they are and what they are authorised to do — and that authority can be delegated, scoped, and revoked at any time.
AIDSelf-certifying identity for people, entities, and agents — no central registry to compromise or capture.
KELEvery identity change is append-only, witnessed, and tamper-evident. A 3-of-N threshold removes any single point of control.
ACDCRoles, entitlements, and attestations are issued as cryptographically chained credentials anchored to the identity layer.
vLEIAgencies and institutions hold globally verifiable organisational identity — the basis for trusted cross-border and inter-agency dealings.
dipAI agents act only under scoped, time-limited authority delegated from a named human. Accountability is built in, not bolted on.
Our research and advisory is organised around eight areas of focus, each mapped to a policy domain a government must own as autonomous AI matures.
National AI-trust strategy, doctrine, and regulatory roadmap.
Inter-agency, allied, and standards-body relationships.
Public-service skills, futures literacy, and citizen education.
Sovereign identity standards and verification infrastructure.
Funding, stewardship, and long-term operational viability.
Service delivery, incident response, and operational assurance.
Audit, transparency, and answerability for AI-driven action.
Structure, governance, and the human conductor model.
Research & resources
Selected papers and resources written for decision-makers. The full library is on the resources page.
The organisational framework behind our programs of work. Explore each area — its purpose, scope, and how the eight interconnect — as applied to sovereign digital trust.
Written for ministers, regulators, and senior officials. The full library is on the resources page.